Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Mccabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company

• 1914 • 235 U.S. 151 • White Court
In the 1914 case of McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a railway company violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by providing separate but unequal facilities for black and white passengers. The plaintiff, Mr. McCabe, argued that he was denied equal protection under law because although there were separate cars for black and white passengers on trains operated by Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company in...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1914
Docket: 15
235 U.S. 151
35 S. Ct. 69
59 L. Ed. 169
1914 U.S. LEXIS 1010
Argued: Oct 26, 1914

Mccabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1914 case of McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a railway company violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by providing separate but unequal facilities for black and white passengers. The plaintiff, Mr. McCabe, argued that he was denied equal protection under law because although there were separate cars for black and white passengers on trains operated by Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company in Oklahoma; only whites had access to dining cars or sleeping accommodations while traveling overnight distances within state lines. The court held that if such services are provided to one race they must be available equally to all races under similar circumstances without any discrimination based on color.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes argued that the majority's decision to uphold a segregation law was incorrect because it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. He contended that separate but equal facilities were inherently unequal and discriminatory against African Americans. Holmes believed that by allowing racial segregation in public transportation, they were endorsing a system of racial discrimination which contradicted constitutional principles of equality before law. The justice also expressed concern about how this ruling could set a dangerous precedent for future cases involving civil rights and race relations in America.

Opinion written by Justice CEHughes(1)
Decided: Nov 30, 1914
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms