Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Mccoach, Collector Of Internal Revenue, v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven Railroad Company

• 1912 • 228 U.S. 295 • White Court
In the case of McCoach, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven Railroad Company (1912), the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railroad company. The dispute centered around whether or not a tax imposed on corporations by Congress was applicable to this particular railroad company. The court held that although railroads are indeed corporations, they were exempt from this specific tax due to an earlier act passed by Congress which excluded "corporations engaged in...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1912
Docket: 670
228 U.S. 295
33 S. Ct. 419
57 L. Ed. 842
1913 U.S. LEXIS 2372
Argued: Jan 14, 1913

Mccoach, Collector Of Internal Revenue, v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven Railroad Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of McCoach, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven Railroad Company (1912), the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railroad company. The dispute centered around whether or not a tax imposed on corporations by Congress was applicable to this particular railroad company. The court held that although railroads are indeed corporations, they were exempt from this specific tax due to an earlier act passed by Congress which excluded "corporations engaged in transportation". This ruling clarified that such exemptions should be interpreted broadly and inclusively rather than narrowly and exclusively. Therefore, even though the Minehill & Schuylkill Haven Railroad Company did more than just transport goods (such as storing them), it still fell under the exemption category because its primary function was transportation.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of McCoach v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven Railroad Company argued that the tax imposed by Congress on corporations, including railroad companies, was constitutional and should be upheld. The dissenters believed that this tax did not infringe upon any state rights or powers as it was a direct tax on the corporation's income and not an indirect burden on its property or operations within a particular state. They also disagreed with the majority's interpretation of what constituted 'income,' arguing that gross receipts from transportation services could indeed be considered as such under federal law. Furthermore, they contended that even if some aspects of taxation were deemed unconstitutional, it would not necessarily invalidate all other parts of the same act - instead each part should be examined separately for constitutionality.

Opinion written by Justice MPitney
Decided: Apr 07, 1913
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms