Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Mcculloch, Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, Et Al. v. Sociedad Nacional De Marineros De Honduras

• 1962 • 372 U.S. 10 • Warren Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case McCulloch, Chairman, National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), et al. v. Sociedad Nacional de Marineros de Honduras in 1962 centered around the jurisdiction of the NLRB over foreign-flag ships and their crews operating in American waters. The Honduran corporation Sociedad Nacional de Marineros operated a ship with an all-Honduran crew that was involved in commerce between New York and Puerto Rico - both U.S territories. A dispute arose when the company refused to...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1962
Docket: 107
372 U.S. 10
83 S. Ct. 671
9 L. Ed. 2d 547
1963 U.S. LEXIS 2395
Argued: Dec 11, 1962

Mcculloch, Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, Et Al. v. Sociedad Nacional De Marineros De Honduras

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case McCulloch, Chairman, National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), et al. v. Sociedad Nacional de Marineros de Honduras in 1962 centered around the jurisdiction of the NLRB over foreign-flag ships and their crews operating in American waters. The Honduran corporation Sociedad Nacional de Marineros operated a ship with an all-Honduran crew that was involved in commerce between New York and Puerto Rico - both U.S territories. A dispute arose when the company refused to bargain with a labor union representing its employees, leading to charges filed with the NLRB for unfair labor practices under Section 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Supreme Court ruled that applying NLRA's provisions on such foreign entities would infringe upon principles of international law and comity; thus it held that Congress did not intend for NLRA to apply here due to lack of explicit statutory language indicating so.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional de Marineros de Honduras, Justice Hugo Black argued that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) did not have jurisdiction over labor disputes involving foreign-flag ships and their crews. He contended that extending NLRB authority to such cases would infringe on the sovereignty of other nations and potentially create international conflicts. Furthermore, he believed it was inappropriate for American courts to apply U.S. labor laws in situations where both parties involved were foreign entities operating outside U.S territory or waters - as was the case with this Honduran ship crewed by Hondurans but docked at an American port during a strike dispute between its owners and workers unionized under an American federation.

Opinion written by Justice TCClark
Decided: Feb 18, 1963
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms