| No search history |
Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

18-9526 McGIRT V. OKLAHOMA DECISION BELOW: PC-2018-1057 THE MOTION OF PETITIONER FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS GRANTED, AND IAN GERSHENGORN, ESQ. OF WASHINGTON, D.C., IS APPOINTED TO SERVE AS COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER IN THIS CASE. PRESS RELEASE OF APRIL 3, 2020 IN KEEPING WITH PUBLIC HEALTH GUIDANCE IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19, THE COURT WILL POSTPONE THE ORAL ARGUMENTS CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR THE APRIL SESSION. PRESS RELEASE OF APRIL 13, 2020 RESCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENTS BY TELEPHONE CONFERENCE. THE JUSTICES AND COUNSEL WILL ALL PARTICIPATE REMOTELY. CERT. GRANTED 12/13/2019 QUESTION PRESENTED: WHETHER OKLAHOMA COURTS CAN CONTINUE TO UNLAWFULLY EXERCISE, UNDER STATE LAW, CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AS"JUSTICIABLE MATTER" IN INDIAN COUNTRY OVER INDIANS ACCUSED OF MAJOR CRIMES ENUMERATED UNDER THE INDIAN MAJOR CRIMES ACT-WHICH ARE UNDER EXCLUSIVE FEDERAL JURISDICTION. LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: PC-2018-1057
In the 2019 case of McGirt v. Oklahoma, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a large portion of eastern Oklahoma remains an American Indian reservation. The decision was based on whether Congress had officially terminated the boundaries of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation reservation, which covers about half of Tulsa and several surrounding counties in Oklahoma. Jimcy McGirt, a member of Seminole Nation who was convicted by state authorities for crimes committed within this area argued his case should have been tried by federal prosecutors due to its location on tribal land. In a 5-4 decision led by Justice Neil Gorsuch, it was determined that Congress never disestablished the Creek Reservation therefore much of Eastern Oklahoma is legally considered Native American territory for purposes such as criminal prosecution and potentially other civil issues.
In the dissenting opinion for MCGIRT v. OKLAHOMA, Chief Justice John Roberts argued that the majority's decision disregarded precedent and practical implications of ruling a large portion of Oklahoma as Native American territory. He contended that Congress had "unquestionably" dissolved the Creek Nation's treaty-guaranteed jurisdiction by transforming tribal lands into an organized U.S state with its own government. The dissent also expressed concerns about potential legal complications arising from this decision, such as reopening past criminal convictions or civil cases under federal law only applicable on reservation land. Furthermore, he believed it could disrupt regulatory authority over environmental standards and taxation in eastern Oklahoma where millions reside today.