Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case involved a challenge to the Veterans' Administration's (VA) interpretation of the law regarding educational benefits for veterans. The petitioner, McKelvey, argued that he was entitled to additional educational assistance under Chapter 34 of Title 38 U.S.C., which provides benefits to veterans who served during certain periods. The VA had denied his claim based on its interpretation that individuals with disabilities resulting from their own willful misconduct were not eligible for extended benefits beyond the standard delimiting period. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, agreeing with lower courts and ruling in favor of Turnage, Administrator of Veterans' Affairs. It concluded that Congress intended to exclude those whose disabilities arose from willful misconduct when it enacted these provisions and found no statutory basis or legislative history indicating otherwise.
Opinion written by Justice White
Decided 20 Apr 1988 · Official report