Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. Stone, Chairman, State Tax Commission

• 1947 • 335 U.S. 80 • Vinson Court
The Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. Stone, Chairman, State Tax Commission case in 1947 revolved around the issue of taxation on interstate commerce and whether it violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S Constitution. The Memphis Natural Gas Company was an interstate pipeline company that transported gas from Texas to Tennessee and other states. The Mississippi State Tax Commission imposed a tax on the company for transporting gas through its state lines which led to this dispute. The Supreme Court...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1947
Docket: 94
335 U.S. 80
68 S. Ct. 1475
92 L. Ed. 2d 1832
1948 U.S. LEXIS 2808
Argued: Dec 08, 1947

Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. Stone, Chairman, State Tax Commission

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. Stone, Chairman, State Tax Commission case in 1947 revolved around the issue of taxation on interstate commerce and whether it violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S Constitution. The Memphis Natural Gas Company was an interstate pipeline company that transported gas from Texas to Tennessee and other states. The Mississippi State Tax Commission imposed a tax on the company for transporting gas through its state lines which led to this dispute. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Memphis Natural Gas Co., stating that Mississippi's tax was unconstitutional as it interfered with interstate commerce by taxing activities outside its jurisdictional boundaries - specifically, those occurring within Tennessee where the natural gas was consumed after transportation via pipelines crossing multiple state borders including Mississippi’s. This decision reinforced principles limiting individual states' power over interstate commerce under federal law while also emphasizing their inability to impose taxes on transactions or activities taking place beyond their territorial limits.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. Stone, Justice Murphy disagreed with the majority's decision that Mississippi could tax a natural gas company based in Tennessee for its use of pipelines running through Mississippi. He argued that this taxation was unconstitutional because it violated the Commerce Clause by placing an undue burden on interstate commerce. According to him, if every state were allowed to impose such taxes on businesses operating across their borders, it would create a chaotic and unmanageable situation for those businesses due to differing tax laws and rates among states. This would ultimately hinder free trade between states which is contrary to what framers intended when they drafted the Constitution.

Opinion written by Justice SFReed
Decided: Jun 21, 1948
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms