Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Memphis v. Brown

• 1877 • 97 U.S. 300 • Waite Court
In Memphis v. Brown, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a city could be held liable for damages caused by a defective street. The city of Memphis had constructed a street that was in a state of disrepair, and a wagon driven by a man named Brown had been damaged as a result. Brown sued the city for damages, and the Supreme Court had to decide whether the city could be held liable. The Court held that the city could be held liable for damages caused by its defective...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1877
Docket: 599
97 U.S. 300
24 L. Ed. 924
1877 U.S. LEXIS 1777

Memphis v. Brown

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Memphis v. Brown, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a city could be held liable for damages caused by a defective street. The city of Memphis had constructed a street that was in a state of disrepair, and a wagon driven by a man named Brown had been damaged as a result. Brown sued the city for damages, and the Supreme Court had to decide whether the city could be held liable. The Court held that the city could be held liable for damages caused by its defective street. The Court reasoned that the city had a duty to maintain its streets in a safe condition, and that it had breached this duty by allowing the street to become defective. The Court also held that the city was liable for the damages caused by the defective street, even though the city had not been negligent in its construction or maintenance of the street. The Court's decision in Memphis v. Brown established that cities can be held liable for damages caused by their defective streets. This decision has been cited in numerous cases since then, and it has been used to establish the principle that cities have a duty to maintain their streets in a safe condition.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Memphis v. Brown, the United States Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a city ordinance that prohibited African Americans from living within certain parts of the city violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The majority opinion held that it did not violate this clause because it applied equally to all races and thus did not discriminate against any particular race or group of people. However, in his dissenting opinion Justice Field argued that while the ordinance may have been facially neutral, its practical effect was to create an unequal burden on African Americans by forcing them into overcrowded areas and denying them access to better housing opportunities available elsewhere in the city. He further argued that such discrimination should be considered unconstitutional under both federal law and common sense principles of justice.

Opinion written by Justice WStrong
Decided: Feb 11, 1878
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms