Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Metropolitan Railroad Company v. Moore

• 1886 • 121 U.S. 558 • Waite Court
In the case of Metropolitan Railroad Company v. Moore, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a railroad company was liable for damages caused by a collision between two of its trains. The plaintiff, Moore, was a passenger on one of the trains and was injured in the collision. Moore sued the railroad company for damages, claiming that the company was negligent in its operation of the trains. The Supreme Court held that the railroad company was liable for the damages...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1886
Docket: 247
121 U.S. 558
7 S. Ct. 1334
30 L. Ed. 1022
1887 U.S. LEXIS 2075
Argued: Apr 21, 1887

Metropolitan Railroad Company v. Moore

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Metropolitan Railroad Company v. Moore, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a railroad company was liable for damages caused by a collision between two of its trains. The plaintiff, Moore, was a passenger on one of the trains and was injured in the collision. Moore sued the railroad company for damages, claiming that the company was negligent in its operation of the trains. The Supreme Court held that the railroad company was liable for the damages caused by the collision. The Court found that the company had a duty to exercise reasonable care in the operation of its trains, and that it had breached this duty by failing to take proper precautions to prevent the collision. The Court also held that the company was liable for the damages caused by the collision, even though the company had not been negligent in its operation of the trains. The Court's decision in this case established that a railroad company is liable for damages caused by a collision between its trains, even if the company was not negligent in its operation of the trains. This decision has been cited in numerous subsequent cases involving railroad companies and their liability for damages caused by collisions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Metropolitan Railroad Company v. Moore, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a railroad company could be held liable for damages caused by an employee’s negligence while operating a train. The majority opinion found that the railroad company was not liable because it had taken reasonable steps to prevent such accidents from occurring and had no knowledge of any potential danger posed by its employees. Justice Field dissented, arguing that the railroad should have been held responsible for its employee’s negligence since it knew or should have known about his dangerous behavior prior to the accident in question. He argued that employers must take responsibility when their employees cause harm due to negligent actions and cannot simply rely on ignorance as an excuse for failing to act appropriately in order to protect others from harm.

Opinion written by Justice SMatthews
Decided: May 02, 1887
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms