Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, Tax Commissioner, Et Al.

• 1975 • 423 U.S. 276 • Burger Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, Tax Commissioner, et al., 1975 revolved around the issue of whether a state could impose a tax on imported goods stored in an importer's warehouse prior to their distribution and sale within the United States without violating the Import-Export Clause of the Constitution. The court ruled in favor of Michelin Tire Corporation stating that such taxes were not unconstitutional as long as they did not interfere with federal power over...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1975
Docket: 74-1396
423 U.S. 276
96 S. Ct. 535
46 L. Ed. 2d 495
1976 U.S. LEXIS 120
Argued: Oct 15, 1975

Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, Tax Commissioner, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, Tax Commissioner, et al., 1975 revolved around the issue of whether a state could impose a tax on imported goods stored in an importer's warehouse prior to their distribution and sale within the United States without violating the Import-Export Clause of the Constitution. The court ruled in favor of Michelin Tire Corporation stating that such taxes were not unconstitutional as long as they did not interfere with federal power over foreign commerce or discriminate against imports when compared to domestic products. This decision overturned Low v Austin (1872) which had previously held that states could not tax imported goods until they had been "broken up" from their original packages for use or resale.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, Justice William O. Douglas argued that the majority's decision to uphold a Georgia tax on imported tires was inconsistent with previous rulings and violated the Import-Export Clause of the U.S Constitution. He contended that this clause prohibits states from imposing taxes on imports or exports without congressional consent, regardless of whether they are in their original package or not when sold by an importer within state lines. In his view, allowing such taxation would undermine national uniformity in dealing with foreign trade and could potentially lead to international discord if individual states were permitted to impose discriminatory taxes against goods from certain countries.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: Jan 14, 1976
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms