Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Mercedel W. Miles, Individually And As Administratrix Of The Succession Of Ludwick Adam Torregano v. Apex Marine Corporation Et Al.

• 1990 • 498 U.S. 19 • Rehnquist Court
In the 1990 case of Mercedel W. Miles v. Apex Marine Corporation, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning maritime law and wrongful death claims under general maritime law and the Jones Act. The plaintiff, Mercedel W. Miles, was representing her deceased son's estate after he died while working aboard an oil tanker owned by Apex Marine Corporation due to alleged negligence and unseaworthiness of vessel conditions as per Jones Act provisions for seamen's injuries or deaths caused by...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1990
Docket: 89-1158
498 U.S. 19
111 S. Ct. 317
112 L. Ed. 2d 275
1990 U.S. LEXIS 5688
Argued: Oct 03, 1990

Mercedel W. Miles, Individually And As Administratrix Of The Succession Of Ludwick Adam Torregano v. Apex Marine Corporation Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1990 case of Mercedel W. Miles v. Apex Marine Corporation, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning maritime law and wrongful death claims under general maritime law and the Jones Act. The plaintiff, Mercedel W. Miles, was representing her deceased son's estate after he died while working aboard an oil tanker owned by Apex Marine Corporation due to alleged negligence and unseaworthiness of vessel conditions as per Jones Act provisions for seamen's injuries or deaths caused by employer negligence or unsafe ship conditions. The court held that there is no recovery for loss of society in a general maritime action for wrongful death based on unseaworthiness; it also clarified that punitive damages are not recoverable in such cases either because they do not align with traditional principles of maritime tort liability which focuses more on compensatory rather than punitive measures. This decision effectively limited potential compensation avenues available to families seeking redress following fatal incidents at sea involving their loved ones.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Miles v. Apex Marine Corporation, Justice Scalia disagreed with the majority's decision to not allow recovery for loss of society in a general maritime wrongful death action. He argued that there was no historical basis or precedent to support this limitation on damages and criticized the majority’s reliance on an analogy between maritime law and land-based tort law. Furthermore, he contended that Congress had never intended such limitations when it enacted statutes governing maritime affairs. According to him, by imposing these restrictions without clear legislative guidance, the Court overstepped its judicial role and encroached upon policy-making territory reserved for Congress.

Opinion written by Justice SDOConnor
Decided: Nov 06, 1990
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms