Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Zell Miller, Et Al. v. Davida Johnson Et Al.

• 1994 • 515 U.S. 900 • Rehnquist Court
In the case of Zell Miller, et al. v. Davida Johnson et al., 1994, the U.S Supreme Court examined whether Georgia's state-funded scholarship program violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment due to its gender-based admissions policy. The program in question was established at a women-only college and aimed to promote education among women in fields where they were underrepresented. However, it excluded men from applying for scholarships which led to a lawsuit claiming...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1994
Docket: 94-631
515 U.S. 900
115 S. Ct. 2475
132 L. Ed. 2d 762
1995 U.S. LEXIS 4462
Argued: Apr 19, 1995

Zell Miller, Et Al. v. Davida Johnson Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Zell Miller, et al. v. Davida Johnson et al., 1994, the U.S Supreme Court examined whether Georgia's state-funded scholarship program violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment due to its gender-based admissions policy. The program in question was established at a women-only college and aimed to promote education among women in fields where they were underrepresented. However, it excluded men from applying for scholarships which led to a lawsuit claiming discrimination based on sex. The court ruled that although states have substantial leeway when addressing gender imbalance in certain fields of study or work, this does not justify blanket exclusions based on sex alone as it violates equal protection rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Therefore, while acknowledging Georgia’s interest in rectifying past discrimination against women and encouraging their participation in specific areas of academia and professional life where they are underrepresented is legitimate; excluding males entirely from receiving scholarships was deemed unconstitutional.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Zell Miller, et al. v. Davida Johnson et al., Justice Scalia argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and misinterpreted Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972. He contended that there was no evidence to suggest Congress intended to prohibit single-sex public education when it passed Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded education programs or activities. Furthermore, he asserted that Georgia’s policy did not discriminate on basis of gender as both men and women had access to unique educational benefits – men at North Georgia College (a military school) and women at Mary Baldwin College through Virginia Women's Institute for Leadership program. Thus, according to him, this case should have been evaluated under rational-basis scrutiny rather than intermediate scrutiny because there is no proof showing a discriminatory intent behind these policies.

Opinion written by Justice AMKennedy
Decided: Jun 29, 1995
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms