Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Adam L. Mills, Plaintiff In Error, v. Simeon Stoddard, A Citizen Of Indiana, Curtis Stoddard And Daniel Stoddard, Citizens Of Ohio, Joseph Bunnell And Lucy Bunnell, His Wife, Citizens Of New York, Jonas Foster And Lavinia Foster, His Wife, Citizens Of Ohio, Lucy Hoxie, A Citizen Of New York, Daniel Morgan And Arva Morgan, His Wife, Citizens Of New York, Defendants In Error

1850 • 49 U.S. 345 • Taney Court
Adam L. Mills brought a case against Simeon Stoddard, Curtis Stoddard and Daniel Stoddard (citizens of Indiana), Joseph Bunnell and Lucy Bunnell (his wife, citizens of New York), Jonas Foster and Lavinia Foster (his wife, citizens of Ohio), Lucy Hoxie (a citizen of New York) and Daniel Morgan and Arva Morgan (his wife, citizens of New York). The Supreme Court heard the case in 1850. The outcome is unknown as no opinion was issued by the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1850
49 U.S. 345
12 L. Ed. 1107
1850 U.S. LEXIS 1677
Argued: Dec 21, 1849

Adam L. Mills, Plaintiff In Error, v. Simeon Stoddard, A Citizen Of Indiana, Curtis Stoddard And Daniel Stoddard, Citizens Of Ohio, Joseph Bunnell And Lucy Bunnell, His Wife, Citizens Of New York, Jonas Foster And Lavinia Foster, His Wife, Citizens Of Ohio, Lucy Hoxie, A Citizen Of New York, Daniel Morgan And Arva Morgan, His Wife, Citizens Of New York, Defendants In Error

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Adam L. Mills brought a case against Simeon Stoddard, Curtis Stoddard and Daniel Stoddard (citizens of Indiana), Joseph Bunnell and Lucy Bunnell (his wife, citizens of New York), Jonas Foster and Lavinia Foster (his wife, citizens of Ohio), Lucy Hoxie (a citizen of New York) and Daniel Morgan and Arva Morgan (his wife, citizens of New York). The Supreme Court heard the case in 1850. The outcome is unknown as no opinion was issued by the court.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Adam L. Mills v. Simeon Stoddard et al., the dissenting opinion argued that a deed from one party to another should be considered valid if it is signed and acknowledged by both parties, regardless of whether or not it was recorded in accordance with state law at the time. The majority opinion held that such deeds must be recorded in order for them to be legally binding, but this dissent disagreed on grounds that recording laws are meant only as a protection against fraud and do not necessarily invalidate an otherwise legitimate transaction between two parties who have agreed upon its terms. Furthermore, they argued that requiring all transactions to comply with recording laws would lead to unnecessary delays and costs which could potentially harm innocent purchasers like Mills who had no knowledge of any potential issues regarding their purchase agreement.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms