Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Milwaukee Electric Railway Light Company v. State Of Wisconsin Ex Rel. City Of Milwaukee

• 1919 • 252 U.S. 100 • White Court
In the case of Milwaukee Electric Railway Light Company v. State of Wisconsin ex rel. City of Milwaukee (1919), the U.S Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a state had the authority to regulate rates charged by public utilities, even when those utilities were owned and operated by private entities. The court ruled in favor of the state, asserting that it did indeed have such power under its police powers doctrine. This decision upheld an order from Wisconsin's Railroad Commission which...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1919
Docket: 55
252 U.S. 100
40 S. Ct. 306
64 L. Ed. 476
1920 U.S. LEXIS 1664
Argued: Nov 10, 1919

Milwaukee Electric Railway Light Company v. State Of Wisconsin Ex Rel. City Of Milwaukee

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Milwaukee Electric Railway Light Company v. State of Wisconsin ex rel. City of Milwaukee (1919), the U.S Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a state had the authority to regulate rates charged by public utilities, even when those utilities were owned and operated by private entities. The court ruled in favor of the state, asserting that it did indeed have such power under its police powers doctrine. This decision upheld an order from Wisconsin's Railroad Commission which reduced streetcar fares in Milwaukee from 7 cents to 6 cents per ride after determining that higher rates were unjust and unreasonable for consumers. The ruling affirmed states' rights to protect their citizens against unfair practices by privately-owned public service corporations operating within their borders.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Milwaukee Electric Railway Light Company v. State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. City of Milwaukee argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established precedent regarding state regulation and control over public utilities. The dissent contended that states have traditionally held broad powers to regulate public utilities, including setting rates, as these entities serve vital public interests and are often granted special privileges or monopolies by the state. It further asserted that judicial review should be limited to ensuring such regulations do not violate constitutional protections against confiscatory rates, rather than delving into questions about reasonableness or fairness which are better left to legislative bodies with more expertise in economic matters.

Opinion written by Justice LDBrandeis
Decided: Mar 01, 1920
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms