Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power Commission Et Al.

• 1973 • 417 U.S. 283 • Burger Court
In the case of Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power Commission, 1973, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether or not the Federal Power Commission (FPC) had overstepped its authority by setting rates for natural gas leases on private and state-owned lands that were higher than those set by federal law for similar leases on federally owned land. The FPC argued it had this power under section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act which gives them jurisdiction over transportation and sale of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1973
Docket: 73-437
417 U.S. 283
94 S. Ct. 2328
41 L. Ed. 2d 72
1974 U.S. LEXIS 21
Argued: Apr 17, 1974

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power Commission Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power Commission, 1973, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether or not the Federal Power Commission (FPC) had overstepped its authority by setting rates for natural gas leases on private and state-owned lands that were higher than those set by federal law for similar leases on federally owned land. The FPC argued it had this power under section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act which gives them jurisdiction over transportation and sale of natural gas in interstate commerce to ensure reasonable rates. However, Mobil Oil Corporation contended that such an interpretation would infringe upon states' rights to manage their own resources as protected by Congress's intent when passing said act. The court ruled in favor of Mobil Oil Corp., stating that while FPC has broad powers under Section 1(b), they do not extend to direct regulation of leasing practices or sales at wellheads; these are matters left primarily to individual states’ control unless specifically addressed otherwise by Congress within legislation itself.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power Commission, it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold the Federal Power Commission's (FPC) jurisdiction over independent producers of natural gas was incorrect and inconsistent with previous court rulings. The dissent emphasized that Congress did not intend for FPC to have such broad authority when it enacted the Natural Gas Act in 1938, which aimed at regulating interstate commerce in natural gas by controlling its transportation and sale but not production or gathering. It further contended that this expansion of regulatory power could potentially harm small independent producers who were already struggling due to low prices set by FPC, thereby threatening domestic energy supply security. Additionally, they disagreed with how majority interpreted certain provisions within Natural Gas Act as granting FPC control over all aspects of natural gas industry including production rates and reserves.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: Jun 10, 1974
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms