Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Monell Et Al. v. Department Of Social Services Of The City Of New York Et Al.

• 1977 • 436 U.S. 658 • Burger Court
In the 1977 case of Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that local governments are "persons" who can be sued for constitutional violations under Section 1983 when such violations result from a governmental policy or custom, even if carried out by its employees. The case arose after female employees at the Department of Social Services and Board of Education in New York claimed they were forced to take unpaid leaves during their...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1977
Docket: 75-1914
436 U.S. 658
98 S. Ct. 2018
56 L. Ed. 2d 611
1978 U.S. LEXIS 100
Argued: Nov 02, 1977

Monell Et Al. v. Department Of Social Services Of The City Of New York Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1977 case of Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that local governments are "persons" who can be sued for constitutional violations under Section 1983 when such violations result from a governmental policy or custom, even if carried out by its employees. The case arose after female employees at the Department of Social Services and Board of Education in New York claimed they were forced to take unpaid leaves during their pregnancies, which was considered discriminatory and unconstitutional. This decision overruled Monroe v. Pape (1961), where it had been held that municipalities were not persons under Section 1983; thus, could not be sued for damages.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, Justice William Rehnquist argued that municipalities should remain immune from liability under Section 1983 unless Congress explicitly states otherwise. He contended that this case did not present a compelling reason to overturn Monroe v. Pape, which had established municipal immunity in 1961 based on an interpretation of Congressional intent when passing the Civil Rights Act in 1871. Rehnquist also disagreed with the majority's view that every act by a city employee could potentially make cities liable under Section 1983; he believed such broad liability would be financially burdensome and administratively unmanageable for local governments.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: Jun 06, 1978
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms