Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Monroe Et Al. v. Board Of Commissioners Of The City Of Jackson Et Al.

• 1967 • 391 U.S. 450 • Warren Court
The Monroe v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Jackson case in 1967 dealt with racial discrimination and segregation within public recreational facilities in Jackson, Tennessee. The plaintiffs, African-American residents, argued that despite a desegregation order issued by the city's board of commissioners to integrate all municipal facilities, discriminatory practices were still prevalent particularly at swimming pools which remained segregated due to private leasing arrangements made by...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1967
Docket: 740
391 U.S. 450
88 S. Ct. 1700
20 L. Ed. 2d 733
1968 U.S. LEXIS 1553
Argued: Apr 03, 1968

Monroe Et Al. v. Board Of Commissioners Of The City Of Jackson Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Monroe v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Jackson case in 1967 dealt with racial discrimination and segregation within public recreational facilities in Jackson, Tennessee. The plaintiffs, African-American residents, argued that despite a desegregation order issued by the city's board of commissioners to integrate all municipal facilities, discriminatory practices were still prevalent particularly at swimming pools which remained segregated due to private leasing arrangements made by the city. The U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs stating that such leasing agreements perpetuated racial segregation and violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights for equal protection under law. This decision reinforced that any attempts to circumvent desegregation orders through indirect means like private leases were unconstitutional.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Monroe et al. v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Jackson et al., Justice Harlan argued that there was no constitutional violation in this case, as it involved a local government's decision to close public facilities rather than desegregate them. He contended that while such an action might be morally questionable and socially undesirable, it did not infringe upon any rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment since all citizens were equally deprived access to these facilities regardless of race or color. Furthermore, he believed that federal courts should refrain from interfering with local decisions unless they clearly violate constitutionally protected rights; otherwise, they risk overstepping their judicial authority and intruding into matters best left to legislative bodies at state or municipal levels.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: May 27, 1968
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms