Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., Et Al.

• 1969 • 398 U.S. 375 • Burger Court
In the 1969 case of Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., et al., the U.S Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a wrongful death action could be brought under general maritime law for deaths occurring in state territorial waters. Prior to this ruling, no such federal common law existed and claims were limited by individual state laws which often led to inconsistent results. The case arose when Edward Moragne died while working as a longshoreman in Florida's territorial waters and his widow...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1969
Docket: 175
398 U.S. 375
90 S. Ct. 1772
26 L. Ed. 2d 339
1970 U.S. LEXIS 76
Argued: Mar 04, 1970

Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1969 case of Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., et al., the U.S Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a wrongful death action could be brought under general maritime law for deaths occurring in state territorial waters. Prior to this ruling, no such federal common law existed and claims were limited by individual state laws which often led to inconsistent results. The case arose when Edward Moragne died while working as a longshoreman in Florida's territorial waters and his widow sought damages from his employer, States Marine Lines, alleging unseaworthiness of the vessel he was working on at the time of his death. The court’s decision overruled its previous stance set forth in "The Harrisburg" (1886), where it had held there was no right to recovery for wrongful death under general maritime law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., Justice Harlan disagreed with the majority's decision to create a new federal common law right of action for wrongful death in territorial waters. He argued that this was an overreach by the judiciary and that it should be left up to Congress to decide whether or not such a right should exist. He also expressed concern about potential confusion and inconsistency resulting from having two different systems (state laws and now federal common law) governing wrongful death claims arising out of maritime incidents. Furthermore, he pointed out that there had been no showing of any significant inadequacy or unfairness in state wrongful-death statutes which would justify judicial intervention on these grounds.

Opinion written by Justice JHarlan(2)
Decided: Jun 15, 1970
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms