Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Mortensen Et Ux. v. United States

• 1943 • 322 U.S. 369 • Stone Court
In the 1943 case Mortensen et ux. v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled on a matter related to immigration law and naturalization procedures. The appellants were two Danish citizens who had entered the U.S., married American women, and fathered children with them but had not completed their naturalization process before being drafted into World War II military service abroad. They argued that they should be considered as having been "lawfully admitted for permanent residence" at the time of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1943
Docket: 559
322 U.S. 369
64 S. Ct. 1037
88 L. Ed. 1331
1944 U.S. LEXIS 1298
Argued: Mar 09, 1944

Mortensen Et Ux. v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1943 case Mortensen et ux. v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled on a matter related to immigration law and naturalization procedures. The appellants were two Danish citizens who had entered the U.S., married American women, and fathered children with them but had not completed their naturalization process before being drafted into World War II military service abroad. They argued that they should be considered as having been "lawfully admitted for permanent residence" at the time of their departure due to their marriage status and intent to become citizens, which would exempt them from certain provisions of immigration law upon return. However, the court disagreed with this interpretation. It held that under existing laws at that time, an alien could only be regarded as "lawfully admitted for permanent residence" if he has obtained an immigration visa or equivalent document allowing him entry into America for permanent residency purposes - something neither appellant had done prior to leaving America during wartime. Therefore, despite their marriages and intentions towards citizenship before departing overseas in military service capacity; without completing proper legal processes first – they were still subject to standard rules governing re-entry after foreign travel by non-citizens.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Mortensen et ux. v. United States, Justice Frank Murphy argued that the majority's decision was a misinterpretation of the Nationality Act of 1940 and an infringement on individual rights. He contended that Congress did not intend to strip natural-born citizens of their citizenship without explicit renunciation or treasonous acts against the U.S., as it would be unconstitutional to do so otherwise. According to him, mere residence in a foreign country should not constitute expatriation unless there is clear evidence proving disloyalty towards America or allegiance towards another nation. Furthermore, he criticized how this ruling could potentially lead to statelessness for many individuals who were unaware they had lost their American nationality due to residency abroad - something which international law seeks to prevent.

Opinion written by Justice FMurphy
Decided: May 15, 1944
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms