Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Moses Lake Homes, Inc., Et Al. v. Grant County

• 1960 • 365 U.S. 744 • Warren Court
In the case of Moses Lake Homes, Inc., et al. v. Grant County in 1960, the U.S Supreme Court addressed a dispute over property tax assessments. The plaintiffs, Moses Lake Homes and others, were developers who had purchased land for residential construction in Grant County, Washington State. They argued that the county's method of assessing their properties was unfair because it did not take into account improvements they made to the land such as roads and utilities which increased its value...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1960
Docket: 212
365 U.S. 744
81 S. Ct. 870
6 L. Ed. 2d 66
1961 U.S. LEXIS 1298
Argued: Mar 23, 1961

Moses Lake Homes, Inc., Et Al. v. Grant County

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Moses Lake Homes, Inc., et al. v. Grant County in 1960, the U.S Supreme Court addressed a dispute over property tax assessments. The plaintiffs, Moses Lake Homes and others, were developers who had purchased land for residential construction in Grant County, Washington State. They argued that the county's method of assessing their properties was unfair because it did not take into account improvements they made to the land such as roads and utilities which increased its value significantly. The court ruled against Moses Lake Homes stating that under Washington law at that time; counties could assess property based on its market value without considering any potential future developments or improvements by owners. Furthermore, it stated that if an owner improves his/her property after January 1 (the assessment date), those improvements cannot be taxed until next year’s assessment. This ruling upheld the principle of uniformity in taxation where all similar properties should be assessed similarly regardless of individual circumstances or actions taken by specific owners post-assessment period.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Moses Lake Homes, Inc., et al. v. Grant County, it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold a tax assessment on property owned by Moses Lake Homes violated principles of fairness and equity. The dissenters contended that because the company had not yet realized any profit from its investment at the time of taxation, it was unjust to impose such a heavy financial burden upon them. They further asserted that this ruling could potentially discourage future business investments in undeveloped land due to fear of premature and excessive taxation before profits are made or even guaranteed. This would be detrimental not only for businesses but also for local economies relying on these investments for growth and development.

Opinion written by Justice CEWhittaker
Decided: Apr 17, 1961
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms