In the case of Moss v. Ramey in 1915, the United States Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over land ownership. The plaintiff, Moss, claimed that he had purchased a piece of property from an individual who had received it as part of a government grant. However, this was disputed by Ramey who argued that the original grantee did not have legal title to sell because they were not citizens at the time they received it and therefore could not legally own land under federal law. The court ruled in favor of Ramey stating that non-citizens cannot acquire valid titles to public lands unless there is explicit statutory authority permitting them to do so.

The Moss v. Ramey case does not appear to have a recorded dissenting opinion available for summarization. The case, which took place in 1915, involved the issue of whether or not an individual could be held liable for damages caused by their livestock wandering onto another person's property. However, specific details about any dissenting opinions are not readily accessible in public records or legal databases. It is possible that this particular Supreme Court case was decided unanimously and therefore did not feature a dissenting opinion from any of the justices.