Murray et al. v. Curlett et al., Constituting the Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City

Opinion summary

Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion

The case of Murray et al. v. Curlett et al., constituting the Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City, was a landmark decision that addressed the issue of school-sponsored prayer and Bible reading in public schools. The plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of these practices, arguing they violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment as applied to states through the Fourteenth Amendment. This case was consolidated with Abington School District v. Schempp when it reached the Supreme Court, which ultimately ruled that mandatory Bible readings and recitations were unconstitutional in public schools because they amounted to government endorsement of religion, thus breaching church-state separation principles.

Opinion written by Justice Clark

Decided 17 Jun 1963 · Official report

usrep374203.pdfOpen in a new tab