Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Jerry Tarkanian

• 1988 • 488 U.S. 179 • Rehnquist Court
In the case of National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Jerry Tarkanian, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of NCAA, stating that it was not a "state actor". The dispute began when Jerry Tarkanian, then head coach for University of Nevada's basketball team, was suspended by NCAA due to alleged recruiting violations. Tarkanian sued on grounds that his constitutional rights were violated as he wasn't provided due process before being penalized. He argued that since many member institutions are...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1988
Docket: 87-1061
488 U.S. 179
109 S. Ct. 454
102 L. Ed. 2d 469
1988 U.S. LEXIS 5613
Argued: Oct 05, 1988

National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Jerry Tarkanian

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Jerry Tarkanian, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of NCAA, stating that it was not a "state actor". The dispute began when Jerry Tarkanian, then head coach for University of Nevada's basketball team, was suspended by NCAA due to alleged recruiting violations. Tarkanian sued on grounds that his constitutional rights were violated as he wasn't provided due process before being penalized. He argued that since many member institutions are state-run and receive public funding, NCAA should be considered a state actor and thus subject to constitutional constraints regarding fair procedure. However, the court disagreed with this argument asserting that while universities may be public entities themselves; their collective participation in an association like NCAA doesn’t make it a state actor too. Therefore, its disciplinary actions don't have to comply with constitutional requirements for procedural fairness under Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION v. JERRY TARKANIAN, Justice White argued that the NCAA should be considered a state actor due to its regulatory power over public universities and their athletic programs. He contended that because public institutions make up a significant portion of the NCAA's membership and these institutions are subject to state control, any disciplinary actions taken by the NCAA against coaches at these schools should be viewed as state action. Therefore, such actions must comply with constitutional standards of fairness under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. In this case, he believed Coach Jerry Tarkanian was denied his right to due process when he was suspended by an NCAA committee without being given adequate notice or opportunity to defend himself against allegations of recruiting violations.

Opinion written by Justice JPStevens
Decided: Dec 12, 1988
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms