Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case addressed whether the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) could prohibit certain practices by employers that discouraged union activities. The dispute arose when a labor union encouraged its members to refuse handling pre-assembled doors, which were manufactured by non-union workers and considered 'struck work.' The National Woodwork Manufacturers Association argued this was an unfair labor practice under Section 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act, claiming it constituted a secondary boycott. However, the NLRB found in favor of the union's actions as they aimed at preserving jobs for their members rather than pressuring neutral third parties. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, ruling that such conduct did not violate federal law because it primarily targeted protecting job conditions within the bargaining unit rather than coercing unrelated entities.
Opinion written by Justice Brennan
Decided 17 Apr 1967 · Official report