Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Nelson, Chairman Of The State Tax Commission, Et Al. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.

• 1940 • 312 U.S. 373 • Hughes Court
In the 1940 case of Nelson, Chairman of the State Tax Commission, et al. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Montgomery Ward & Co., a mail-order company that had been charged with taxes by Utah for its catalog sales to residents within the state. The court held that since these transactions were interstate commerce and not intrastate business activities, they could not be subjected to local taxation under federal law. This decision was based on an...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1940
Docket: 256
312 U.S. 373
61 S. Ct. 593
85 L. Ed. 897
1941 U.S. LEXIS 925
Argued: Jan 13, 1941

Nelson, Chairman Of The State Tax Commission, Et Al. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1940 case of Nelson, Chairman of the State Tax Commission, et al. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Montgomery Ward & Co., a mail-order company that had been charged with taxes by Utah for its catalog sales to residents within the state. The court held that since these transactions were interstate commerce and not intrastate business activities, they could not be subjected to local taxation under federal law. This decision was based on an interpretation of Article I Section 8 Clause 3 (the Commerce Clause) of the United States Constitution which gives Congress exclusive power over interstate commerce. Therefore, any attempt by a state to impose tax obligations on such transactions would infringe upon this constitutional provision and is thus invalid.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Nelson, Chairman of the State Tax Commission, et al. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., Justice Roberts argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings regarding interstate commerce and taxation. He contended that Utah's tax on out-of-state retailers did not discriminate against or burden interstate commerce because it applied equally to all businesses operating within its borders, regardless of their location outside state lines. Furthermore, he maintained that this case differed from others in which taxes were deemed unconstitutional due to their impact on interstate commerce since there was no evidence suggesting such an effect here. In his view, upholding Utah's tax would have preserved states' rights to regulate and tax businesses within their jurisdiction without interfering with federal authority over interstate trade.

Opinion written by Justice WODouglas
Decided: Feb 17, 1941
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms