Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Nelson, Chairman Of The State Tax Commission, Et Al. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

• 1940 • 312 U.S. 359 • Hughes Court
In the case of Nelson, Chairman of the State Tax Commission, et al. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 1940, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Sears, Roebuck & Co., a mail-order company that had been assessed for taxes by Utah's state tax commission on its gross receipts from sales within Utah. The court held that such taxation was unconstitutional as it violated both due process and commerce clauses under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. The court reasoned that since all orders were...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1940
Docket: 255
312 U.S. 359
61 S. Ct. 586
85 L. Ed. 888
1941 U.S. LEXIS 924
Argued: Jan 13, 1941

Nelson, Chairman Of The State Tax Commission, Et Al. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Nelson, Chairman of the State Tax Commission, et al. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 1940, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Sears, Roebuck & Co., a mail-order company that had been assessed for taxes by Utah's state tax commission on its gross receipts from sales within Utah. The court held that such taxation was unconstitutional as it violated both due process and commerce clauses under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. The court reasoned that since all orders were accepted outside Utah and goods were shipped from out-of-state warehouses into Utah via interstate commerce channels (railroads), this constituted an undue burden on interstate commerce which states are not allowed to regulate or interfere with according to federal law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Nelson, Chairman of the State Tax Commission, et al. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Justice Frankfurter argued that there was no constitutional violation in taxing out-of-state businesses differently than local ones. He believed that states have a right to protect and favor their own economic interests over those of other states as long as it does not interfere with interstate commerce or violate any specific constitutional provisions. In this case, he felt that Utah's tax law did not discriminate against interstate commerce because it applied equally to all corporations doing business within its borders regardless of where they were incorporated or had their principal place of business. Furthermore, he pointed out that Sears could easily avoid paying higher taxes by incorporating itself in Utah instead of Illinois which would make it a domestic corporation under state law.

Opinion written by Justice WODouglas
Decided: Feb 17, 1941
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms