Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

New Colonial Ice Co., Inc. v. Helvering, Commissioner Of Internal Revenue

• 1933 • 292 U.S. 435 • Hughes Court
In the case of New Colonial Ice Co., Inc. v. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue in 1933, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a corporation's payment to satisfy personal liability for its president was not deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense under section 234(a)(1) of the Revenue Act of 1928. The court held that such payments were not made primarily for business purposes but rather to protect or promote goodwill among stockholders who might otherwise have been required...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1933
Docket: 547
292 U.S. 435
54 S. Ct. 788
78 L. Ed. 1348
1934 U.S. LEXIS 721
Argued: Mar 05, 1934

New Colonial Ice Co., Inc. v. Helvering, Commissioner Of Internal Revenue

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of New Colonial Ice Co., Inc. v. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue in 1933, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a corporation's payment to satisfy personal liability for its president was not deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense under section 234(a)(1) of the Revenue Act of 1928. The court held that such payments were not made primarily for business purposes but rather to protect or promote goodwill among stockholders who might otherwise have been required to bear these costs personally. Therefore, they could not be considered normal operating expenses eligible for tax deductions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for New Colonial Ice Co., Inc. v. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Justice Cardozo disagreed with the majority's decision that a corporation could not deduct from its income taxes money it paid to satisfy personal debts of its stockholders. He argued that such payments were ordinary and necessary business expenses because they helped maintain the company's reputation and credit standing in the community, which are crucial for any successful business operation. Furthermore, he contended that these payments should be considered losses incurred during taxable years under Section 23(e) of the Revenue Act of 1928 since they resulted from transactions entered into for profit but ended up causing financial harm to the corporation instead.

Opinion written by Justice WVanDevanter
Decided: May 28, 1934
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms