Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

New York Central And Hudson River Railroad Company v. United States

• 1908 • 212 U.S. 500 • Fuller Court
In the 1908 case of New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court established a significant precedent in corporate law by ruling that corporations can be held criminally liable for the actions of their employees if those actions were performed within the scope of their employment and for the benefit of the corporation. The case arose when an employee at New York Central Railroad gave illegal rebates to customers; even though this was against company...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1908
Docket: 69
212 U.S. 500
29 S. Ct. 309
53 L. Ed. 624
1909 U.S. LEXIS 1833
Argued: Dec 14, 1908

New York Central And Hudson River Railroad Company v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1908 case of New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court established a significant precedent in corporate law by ruling that corporations can be held criminally liable for the actions of their employees if those actions were performed within the scope of their employment and for the benefit of the corporation. The case arose when an employee at New York Central Railroad gave illegal rebates to customers; even though this was against company policy, it benefited them financially. The court ruled that since corporations are legal persons under U.S law, they should be subject to criminal laws just like natural persons would be in similar circumstances.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company v. United States, Justice Moody argued that a corporation cannot be held criminally liable for the actions of its employees unless it can be proven that those at the top of the corporate hierarchy had knowledge or gave consent to such actions. He contended that attributing criminal intent to a corporation based on an employee's misconduct is unjust as corporations act through various agents who may not always represent their employer’s interests accurately. The justice also expressed concern about potential misuse of this ruling by prosecutors in future cases against corporations, which could lead to unfair punishments without proper evidence of corporate complicity or awareness.

Opinion written by Justice WRDay
Decided: Feb 23, 1909
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms