Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

People Of The State Of New York Ex Rel. Doyle Et Al. v. Atwell, Acting Chief Of Police Of The City Of Mount Vernon, Et Al.

• 1922 • 261 U.S. 590 • Taft Court
In the 1922 case of People of the State of New York ex rel. Doyle et al. v. Atwell, Acting Chief of Police of the City Of Mount Vernon, et al., a group led by Doyle challenged their arrests for violating an ordinance in Mount Vernon, New York that prohibited public meetings without a permit from local police authorities. The plaintiffs argued that this law violated their First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly as well as Fourteenth Amendment protections against deprivation of liberty...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1922
Docket: 306
261 U.S. 590
43 S. Ct. 410
67 L. Ed. 814
1923 U.S. LEXIS 2591

People Of The State Of New York Ex Rel. Doyle Et Al. v. Atwell, Acting Chief Of Police Of The City Of Mount Vernon, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1922 case of People of the State of New York ex rel. Doyle et al. v. Atwell, Acting Chief of Police of the City Of Mount Vernon, et al., a group led by Doyle challenged their arrests for violating an ordinance in Mount Vernon, New York that prohibited public meetings without a permit from local police authorities. The plaintiffs argued that this law violated their First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly as well as Fourteenth Amendment protections against deprivation of liberty without due process. However, the Supreme Court upheld their convictions on appeal stating that such regulations were within reasonable bounds set by municipalities to maintain order and safety in public spaces.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for People of the State of New York ex rel. Doyle et al. v. Atwell, Acting Chief of Police of the City of Mount Vernon, et al., Justice Holmes disagreed with the majority's decision to uphold a law that allowed police officers to arrest individuals without a warrant if they had reasonable cause to believe that person was involved in illegal gambling activities. He argued that this law violated an individual's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures because it gave too much discretion to police officers and did not require them to obtain a warrant before making an arrest based on suspicion alone. Furthermore, he contended that such arrests could be made arbitrarily or discriminatorily due to lack of oversight or checks on police power under this law.

Opinion written by Justice ETSanford
Decided: Apr 09, 1923
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms