Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Company, Division Of Textron, Inc.

• 1973 • 416 U.S. 267 • Burger Court
In the case of National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Company, Division of Textron Inc., 1973, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that managerial employees are not covered by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and therefore do not have collective bargaining rights. The court held that it was within Congress's purview to decide whether managers should be included in labor laws or not. The dispute arose when Bell Aerospace tried to prevent its buyers from joining a union on grounds they...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1973
Docket: 72-1598
416 U.S. 267
94 S. Ct. 1757
40 L. Ed. 2d 134
1974 U.S. LEXIS 35
Argued: Jan 14, 1974

National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Company, Division Of Textron, Inc.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Company, Division of Textron Inc., 1973, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that managerial employees are not covered by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and therefore do not have collective bargaining rights. The court held that it was within Congress's purview to decide whether managers should be included in labor laws or not. The dispute arose when Bell Aerospace tried to prevent its buyers from joining a union on grounds they were part of management. The NLRB disagreed with this classification and ordered a representation election for these workers which led to legal proceedings culminating at the Supreme Court level.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case of National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Company, Division of Textron Inc., Justice Douglas argued that managerial employees should be allowed to unionize and bargain collectively under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). He contended that excluding these employees from NLRA protections was inconsistent with both legislative intent and previous court decisions. Douglas pointed out that Congress had not explicitly excluded managers from collective bargaining rights in their drafting of the NLRA, suggesting they intended for all workers to have these rights. Furthermore, he noted past Supreme Court cases where managerial staff were permitted to form unions without any negative impact on labor relations or business operations. Therefore, he believed it was inappropriate for this precedent to be overturned based solely on a policy decision by the NLRB.

Opinion written by Justice LFPowell
Decided: Apr 23, 1974
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms