Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

National Labor Relations Board v. Natural Gas Utility District Of Hawkins County, Tennessee

• 1970 • 402 U.S. 600 • Burger Court
In the case of National Labor Relations Board v. Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins County, Tennessee (1970), the Supreme Court ruled that a public utility district established under state law was an "employer" within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The court held that Congress intended to include political subdivisions in its definition of employer when it amended NLRA in 1947. This decision came after a dispute between employees and management over...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1970
Docket: 785
402 U.S. 600
91 S. Ct. 1746
29 L. Ed. 2d 206
1971 U.S. LEXIS 126
Argued: Apr 20, 1971

National Labor Relations Board v. Natural Gas Utility District Of Hawkins County, Tennessee

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of National Labor Relations Board v. Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins County, Tennessee (1970), the Supreme Court ruled that a public utility district established under state law was an "employer" within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The court held that Congress intended to include political subdivisions in its definition of employer when it amended NLRA in 1947. This decision came after a dispute between employees and management over union representation rights at a natural gas company owned by Hawkins County, Tennessee. The county argued it was not subject to federal labor laws because it is a government entity rather than private business. However, Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote for majority opinion stating that there's no reason why publicly-owned businesses should be exempt from these rules if they compete with privately-owned ones.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case of NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. NATURAL GAS UTILITY DISTRICT OF HAWKINS COUNTY, TENNESSEE, 1970, it was argued that the Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins County should not be considered a political subdivision and therefore exempt from National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) jurisdiction. The dissenting justices believed that just because an entity is created by state law does not automatically make it a political subdivision if its function is more commercial than governmental. They pointed out that many entities are created by state laws but operate in ways similar to private corporations. Therefore, they contended that these types of organizations should fall under NLRB's jurisdiction as their operations have significant impacts on commerce and labor relations.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: Jun 01, 1971
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms