Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

National Labor Relations Board v. Radio And Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212, International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-cio

• 1960 • 364 U.S. 573 • Warren Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case National Labor Relations Board v. Radio and Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO in 1960 revolved around the issue of whether a union's discipline on its members for crossing an unauthorized picket line constituted unfair labor practices under sections 8(b)(1)(A) and (b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act. The court ruled that it did not constitute unfair labor practice as long as it was within...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1960
Docket: 69
364 U.S. 573
81 S. Ct. 330
5 L. Ed. 2d 302
1961 U.S. LEXIS 1938
Argued: Nov 10, 1960

National Labor Relations Board v. Radio And Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212, International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-cio

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case National Labor Relations Board v. Radio and Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO in 1960 revolved around the issue of whether a union's discipline on its members for crossing an unauthorized picket line constituted unfair labor practices under sections 8(b)(1)(A) and (b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act. The court ruled that it did not constitute unfair labor practice as long as it was within the bounds set by Congress in section 7 which allows employees to refrain from collective bargaining or other mutual aid without fear of penalty imposed by their own unions. However, if such penalties were used to restrain or coerce employees in exercising rights guaranteed them by section 7 then they would be considered unlawful.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case of National Labor Relations Board v. Radio and Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO (1960), Justice Frankfurter disagreed with the majority's interpretation of Section 8(b)(4)(A) of the Taft-Hartley Act. He argued that this section was designed to prevent unions from engaging in secondary boycotts or strikes aimed at neutral employers who were not directly involved in a labor dispute. However, he did not believe it should be applied to situations where a union is seeking better working conditions or wages from their direct employer - even if this action indirectly affects other businesses. In his view, applying Section 8(b)(4)(A) too broadly could infringe upon workers' rights to strike and collectively bargain as protected by federal law.

Opinion written by Justice HLBlack
Decided: Jan 09, 1961
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms