Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division Of Borg-warner Corp.

• 1957 • 356 U.S. 342 • Warren Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corp., 1957, centered on the issue of collective bargaining and what topics are mandatory for such negotiations under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corporation refused to include a union shop clause in its contract with workers, leading to an impasse in negotiations. The company also insisted that any agreement must contain provisions about matters not...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1957
Docket: 53
356 U.S. 342
78 S. Ct. 718
2 L. Ed. 2d 823
1958 U.S. LEXIS 1816
Argued: Nov 20, 1957

National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division Of Borg-warner Corp.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corp., 1957, centered on the issue of collective bargaining and what topics are mandatory for such negotiations under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corporation refused to include a union shop clause in its contract with workers, leading to an impasse in negotiations. The company also insisted that any agreement must contain provisions about matters not directly related to employment conditions - specifically, it wanted a provision stating that no strikes or lockouts would occur during the term of the agreement. When taken before the NLRB, they ruled against Wooster citing their refusal as unfair labor practice but did not comment on inclusion of non-mandatory subjects into agreements. However, upon reaching Supreme Court review, it was decided that while employers cannot refuse bargaining over mandatory subjects like wages and hours (which includes union security), they can insist on including non-mandatory subjects in any final agreement without facing charges for unfair labor practices.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case of National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corp., Justice Brennan disagreed with the majority's view that an employer is not required to bargain over a union shop agreement unless it includes a provision exempting employees who are members of religious sects opposed to joining or financially supporting labor organizations. He argued that this interpretation was inconsistent with previous court decisions and Congressional intent, which he believed clearly indicated that employers must negotiate on all mandatory subjects of bargaining, including union security provisions like those at issue in this case. Furthermore, he contended that by allowing employers to refuse negotiation on these terms without facing unfair labor practice charges, the Court was effectively permitting them to unilaterally dictate terms and conditions of employment - something expressly prohibited under federal law.

Opinion written by Justice HHBurton
Decided: May 05, 1958
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms