Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

North American Cold Storage Company, Appellant, v. City Of Chicago Et Al.

• 1908 • 211 U.S. 306 • Fuller Court
In the case of North American Cold Storage Company v. City of Chicago et al., 1908, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the city's right to regulate public health and safety. The North American Cold Storage Company had challenged a Chicago ordinance that prohibited storage of poultry for more than twenty days, arguing it was an unreasonable restriction on commerce. However, the court upheld this regulation as a legitimate exercise of police power by local government to protect consumers from...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1908
Docket: 28
211 U.S. 306
29 S. Ct. 101
53 L. Ed. 195
1908 U.S. LEXIS 1546
Argued: Nov 13, 1908

North American Cold Storage Company, Appellant, v. City Of Chicago Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of North American Cold Storage Company v. City of Chicago et al., 1908, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the city's right to regulate public health and safety. The North American Cold Storage Company had challenged a Chicago ordinance that prohibited storage of poultry for more than twenty days, arguing it was an unreasonable restriction on commerce. However, the court upheld this regulation as a legitimate exercise of police power by local government to protect consumers from potential health risks associated with spoiled food. This decision affirmed municipalities' authority to enact regulations aimed at safeguarding public welfare even when such rules might impact business operations.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for North American Cold Storage Company v. City of Chicago, Justice Harlan argued that the city's seizure and destruction of food deemed unfit for human consumption was a violation of due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. He contended that such action could only be justified if there were an immediate danger to public health, which he did not believe was present in this case. Furthermore, he stated that it is essential for property owners to have an opportunity to challenge such determinations before their goods are destroyed. In his view, without providing adequate notice or hearing prior to condemnation and destruction of property, the city had overstepped its authority and infringed upon constitutional protections against deprivation of property without due process.

Opinion written by Justice RWPeckham
Decided: Dec 07, 1908
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms