Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

North Carolina State Board Of Education Et Al. v. Swann Et Al.

• 1970 • 402 U.S. 43 • Burger Court
In the case of North Carolina State Board of Education et al. v. Swann et al., 1970, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of desegregation busing as a means to eliminate racial segregation within public schools. The court held that federal courts had the authority to oversee and produce remedies for state-imposed discrimination, including ordering cross-district busing if necessary. This decision came after a group of parents from Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District sued on behalf of their...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1970
Docket: 498
402 U.S. 43
91 S. Ct. 1284
28 L. Ed. 2d 586
1971 U.S. LEXIS 55
Argued: Oct 13, 1970

North Carolina State Board Of Education Et Al. v. Swann Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of North Carolina State Board of Education et al. v. Swann et al., 1970, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of desegregation busing as a means to eliminate racial segregation within public schools. The court held that federal courts had the authority to oversee and produce remedies for state-imposed discrimination, including ordering cross-district busing if necessary. This decision came after a group of parents from Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District sued on behalf of their children who were being sent to racially segregated schools despite living closer to integrated ones. The ruling was significant because it affirmed that states could not maintain or enforce laws intended to segregate public schools along racial lines and paved the way for further integration efforts across America's education system.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for North Carolina State Board of Education v. Swann, Justice Hugo Black argued that federal courts should not have the authority to dictate specific methods for achieving racial balance in public schools. He believed that such decisions were best left to local authorities who are more familiar with their communities' unique circumstances and needs. Furthermore, he contended that court-ordered busing plans could potentially violate the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by treating students differently based on race. In his view, desegregation efforts should focus on eliminating discriminatory practices rather than mandating particular outcomes or ratios of racial representation within schools.

Opinion written by Justice WEBurger
Decided: Apr 20, 1971
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms