Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

O.b. Latham Et Al.v. United States

• 1869 • 76 U.S. 146 • Chase Court
O.B. Latham et al. v. United States was a Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of whether the United States government had the right to tax the income of a state-chartered bank. The case was brought by O.B. Latham and other shareholders of the Bank of the State of Arkansas, who argued that the federal government did not have the authority to tax the bank's income. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States, holding that the federal government had the power to tax the income of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1869
Docket: 6
76 U.S. 146
19 L. Ed. 772
1869 U.S. LEXIS -99

O.b. Latham Et Al.v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

O.B. Latham et al. v. United States was a Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of whether the United States government had the right to tax the income of a state-chartered bank. The case was brought by O.B. Latham and other shareholders of the Bank of the State of Arkansas, who argued that the federal government did not have the authority to tax the bank's income. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States, holding that the federal government had the power to tax the income of a state-chartered bank. The Court reasoned that the power to tax was an inherent power of the federal government, and that the power to tax was necessary to the proper functioning of the government. The Court also held that the power to tax was not limited to the federal government, and that the states had the power to tax as well. The decision in this case established the principle that the federal government has the power to tax the income of state-chartered banks.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In O.B. Latham et al v United States, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a tax imposed by Congress on distilled spirits was unconstitutional as it violated the Fifth Amendment's prohibition against taking private property for public use without just compensation. The majority opinion held that the tax did not violate this clause because it was an exercise of Congress' power to lay and collect taxes, which is expressly granted in Article I of the Constitution. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision arguing that while Congress has broad powers when it comes to taxation, they are still limited by other provisions in the Constitution such as those found in Amendments 5 and 14 which protect citizens from having their property taken away without due process or just compensation. He argued that since this particular tax had no relation to any legitimate purpose of government but rather served only as a means for raising revenue then its imposition constituted an illegal taking under these constitutional protections and should be struck down accordingly.

Opinion written by Justice SPChase
Decided: Apr 20, 1870
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms