Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Ohio Oil Company v. Indiana

• 1899 • 177 U.S. 213 • Fuller Court
In the 1899 case of Ohio Oil Company v. Indiana, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a state law that allowed for regulation of oil and gas drilling to prevent waste and protect property rights. The State of Indiana had sued Ohio Oil Company for extracting natural gas from an adjacent landowner's property without permission, which was in violation of state law at the time. The company argued that this violated their constitutional right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment as it deprived...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1899
Docket: 85
177 U.S. 213
20 S. Ct. 585
44 L. Ed. 740
1900 U.S. LEXIS 1790
Argued: Dec 18, 1899

Ohio Oil Company v. Indiana

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1899 case of Ohio Oil Company v. Indiana, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a state law that allowed for regulation of oil and gas drilling to prevent waste and protect property rights. The State of Indiana had sued Ohio Oil Company for extracting natural gas from an adjacent landowner's property without permission, which was in violation of state law at the time. The company argued that this violated their constitutional right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment as it deprived them of their property without just compensation or legal proceedings. However, Justice White delivered the court's opinion stating that states have inherent police power to regulate industries within their borders when necessary for public health, safety or welfare - including preventing wasteful practices in oil and gas extraction industry.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Ohio Oil Company v. Indiana, Justice Brewer argued that the state's regulation of oil drilling was an overreach of its police power and infringed upon private property rights. He contended that while states have a right to regulate certain industries in order to protect public health or safety, this case did not fall under those categories as there was no imminent danger posed by the company's actions. Furthermore, he asserted that if every use of property which could potentially cause harm were prohibited by law, it would severely limit individual freedom and economic progress. Therefore, according to Justice Brewer’s perspective on this case, Indiana had unjustly interfered with Ohio Oil Company's lawful business operations without sufficient justification.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Apr 09, 1800
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms