Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Oklahoma Packing Co. Et Al. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.

• 1939 • 309 U.S. 4 • Hughes Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Oklahoma Packing Co. et al. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., 1939, revolved around a dispute between the two parties over electricity rates set by the Corporation Commission of Oklahoma for industrial consumers in the state's capital city, which were claimed to be discriminatory and unreasonable by the appellants (Oklahoma Packing Company). The court held that while it was within its jurisdiction to review orders made by state commissions regarding utility rates under...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1939
Docket: 19
309 U.S. 4
60 S. Ct. 215
84 L. Ed. 537
1940 U.S. LEXIS 1044
Argued: Oct 17, 1939

Oklahoma Packing Co. Et Al. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Oklahoma Packing Co. et al. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., 1939, revolved around a dispute between the two parties over electricity rates set by the Corporation Commission of Oklahoma for industrial consumers in the state's capital city, which were claimed to be discriminatory and unreasonable by the appellants (Oklahoma Packing Company). The court held that while it was within its jurisdiction to review orders made by state commissions regarding utility rates under certain circumstances, it would not intervene if there was no clear violation of constitutional rights or federal law involved in such decisions - as long as they are reasonable and non-discriminatory according to local standards and conditions. In this particular case, since there was no evidence presented proving that these rate orders violated any constitutional provisions or federal laws nor were they arbitrary or capricious based on local conditions; hence, their validity could not be challenged before Federal courts.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Oklahoma Packing Co. et al. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., Justice Black argued that the majority's decision to uphold a state law allowing utilities to charge higher rates in order to recoup losses from bad investments was fundamentally unfair and unjustified by any compelling public interest. He contended that such laws effectively forced consumers, who had no control over or responsibility for these failed ventures, to subsidize private corporations' business risks and mistakes through their utility bills. This not only violated principles of fairness but also threatened economic stability by encouraging reckless investment behavior among companies confident they could pass on any losses without consequence.

Opinion written by Justice FFrankfurter
Decided: Jan 15, 1940
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms