Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Old Dominion Steamship Company v. Virginia

• 1904 • 198 U.S. 299 • Fuller Court
In the case of Old Dominion Steamship Company v. Virginia, 1904, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a state could not impose taxes on interstate commerce activities beyond its jurisdictional boundaries. The Old Dominion Steamship Company was an interstate business with operations in several states including New York and Virginia. The company's headquarters were located in New York but it also had offices and wharves in Norfolk, Virginia where it loaded and unloaded cargo from ships traveling...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1904
Docket: 231
198 U.S. 299
25 S. Ct. 686
49 L. Ed. 1059
1905 U.S. LEXIS 1105
Argued: Apr 25, 1905

Old Dominion Steamship Company v. Virginia

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Old Dominion Steamship Company v. Virginia, 1904, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a state could not impose taxes on interstate commerce activities beyond its jurisdictional boundaries. The Old Dominion Steamship Company was an interstate business with operations in several states including New York and Virginia. The company's headquarters were located in New York but it also had offices and wharves in Norfolk, Virginia where it loaded and unloaded cargo from ships traveling between various ports along the Atlantic coast. The State of Virginia imposed a tax on all gross receipts earned by companies operating within its borders which included revenue generated outside of the state as well as income derived from interstate commerce activities such as shipping freight across state lines. This led to double taxation for businesses like Old Dominion who were already paying taxes on these earnings in other states. The court held that this practice violated both due process rights under Fourteenth Amendment and Commerce Clause protections against discriminatory or burdensome taxation by individual states on interstate trade or commerce.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Old Dominion Steamship Company v. Virginia argued that the state had a right to tax property within its jurisdiction, regardless of whether it was used for interstate commerce or not. The justice disagreed with the majority's interpretation of constitutional law and believed that there should be no exception for vessels engaged in interstate trade. He contended that such an exemption would unfairly burden other forms of property and disrupt states' abilities to raise revenue through taxation. Furthermore, he asserted that this decision contradicted previous rulings by the court which upheld similar taxes on railroad cars involved in interstate commerce. Ultimately, he maintained that if a vessel is physically present within a state and benefits from its laws and protections, then it should be subject to taxation like any other piece of property.

Opinion written by Justice DJBrewer
Decided: May 15, 1905
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms