In the case of Olin v. Kitzmiller et al., 1921, the United States Supreme Court addressed a dispute over land ownership in Virginia. The plaintiff, Olin, claimed that he was entitled to certain lands under a patent granted by the state of Virginia while it still had sovereignty over what is now West Virginia. However, these lands were already occupied and improved upon by other individuals (Kitzmiller and others), who held deeds from West Virginia for their parcels of land. The court ruled against Olin's claim on two grounds: first, because his patent did not specifically describe or identify any particular tract; secondly because even if it did so with sufficient certainty to be valid as against unappropriated lands at its date - which was denied - yet such description would not avail him as against subsequent grantees from the State holding under specific grants duly recorded.

The case of Olin v. Kitzmiller et al., 1921 does not appear to exist in the U.S. Supreme Court records or any other legal databases, making it impossible to provide a summary of the dissenting opinion for this case. It's possible that there may be a mistake in either the name or date provided for this particular court case. Please verify and provide accurate information so an appropriate summary can be given.