Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

International Union Of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Afl-cio v. Flair Builders, Inc.

• 1971 • 406 U.S. 487 • Burger Court
In the case of International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO v. Flair Builders, Inc., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Flair Builders. The dispute arose when a labor union picketed at a residential construction site operated by Flair Builders to compel them to hire only unionized workers. This action was deemed illegal under Illinois law which prohibited such practices on residential sites unless there was an existing labor dispute between the workers and their employer...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1971
Docket: 71-41
406 U.S. 487
92 S. Ct. 1710
32 L. Ed. 2d 248
1972 U.S. LEXIS 142
Argued: Apr 10, 1972

International Union Of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Afl-cio v. Flair Builders, Inc.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO v. Flair Builders, Inc., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Flair Builders. The dispute arose when a labor union picketed at a residential construction site operated by Flair Builders to compel them to hire only unionized workers. This action was deemed illegal under Illinois law which prohibited such practices on residential sites unless there was an existing labor dispute between the workers and their employer - which wasn't present in this case. The court held that while unions have a constitutional right to free speech and assembly, these rights do not supersede state laws aimed at protecting citizens from unwanted intrusions into their privacy or peaceful enjoyment of their homes. Therefore, it upheld Illinois' restriction on picketing as it served significant government interests without infringing upon more speech than necessary.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case of International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO v. Flair Builders, Inc., Justice Black disagreed with the majority's decision to uphold a state court ruling that allowed an employer to sue a union for damages resulting from peaceful picketing. He argued that this violated First Amendment rights and was contrary to previous Supreme Court decisions which protected non-violent labor protests. Furthermore, he contended that allowing such lawsuits could have chilling effects on unions' abilities to advocate for their members' interests effectively. In his view, if employers could easily sue unions over any perceived economic harm caused by peaceful picketing or other forms of protest, then these essential tools in labor disputes would be significantly weakened.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: May 30, 1972
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms