Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Local 926, International Union Of Operating Engineers, Afl-cio, Et Al. v. Jones

• 1982 • 460 U.S. 669 • Burger Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Local 926, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Jones (1982) centered on the issue of whether a union could be held liable for damages under federal labor law when it breached its duty to represent a member fairly during grievance proceedings with an employer. The plaintiff was fired by his employer and sought help from his union in filing a grievance against the company; however, he claimed that the union did not adequately represent him...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1982
Docket: 81-1574
460 U.S. 669
103 S. Ct. 1453
75 L. Ed. 2d 368
1983 U.S. LEXIS 139
Argued: Dec 01, 1982

Local 926, International Union Of Operating Engineers, Afl-cio, Et Al. v. Jones

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Local 926, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Jones (1982) centered on the issue of whether a union could be held liable for damages under federal labor law when it breached its duty to represent a member fairly during grievance proceedings with an employer. The plaintiff was fired by his employer and sought help from his union in filing a grievance against the company; however, he claimed that the union did not adequately represent him due to racial discrimination. The court ruled in favor of Jones stating that unions can indeed be held accountable for monetary damages if they fail their duty of fair representation towards their members during such proceedings.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Local 926, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Jones (1982), Justice Brennan argued that the majority's decision to allow a state court to award damages against a union for secondary picketing violated federal labor law and policy. He contended that Congress had deliberately chosen not to provide such remedies in order to balance competing interests between unions and employers under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). According to him, allowing states to interfere with this delicate balance would undermine national uniformity in labor relations. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's interpretation of previous Supreme Court decisions on preemption doctrine as well as their view that NLRA did not preempt state action because it was silent on damage remedies for unfair labor practices.

Opinion written by Justice BRWhite
Decided: Apr 04, 1983
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms