Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Oregon Steam Navigation Company v. Winsor

• 1873 • 87 U.S. 64 • Waite Court
In the case of Oregon Steam Navigation Company v. Winsor, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a contract between two parties could be enforced when one party had not received full payment for their services. The plaintiff, Winsor, had contracted to provide steamboat transportation services to the defendant company and was only paid half of what he was owed. He then sued for breach of contract in an effort to receive his remaining wages. The court ultimately ruled that although...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1873
87 U.S. 64
22 L. Ed. 315
1873 U.S. LEXIS 1488
Argued: Mar 10, 1874

Oregon Steam Navigation Company v. Winsor

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Oregon Steam Navigation Company v. Winsor, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a contract between two parties could be enforced when one party had not received full payment for their services. The plaintiff, Winsor, had contracted to provide steamboat transportation services to the defendant company and was only paid half of what he was owed. He then sued for breach of contract in an effort to receive his remaining wages. The court ultimately ruled that although there may have been some technical breaches on both sides, it would be unjust to deny Winsor his due compensation since he had already provided all necessary services as agreed upon in the initial agreement. This decision established precedent that contracts should still be honored even if they are not fully executed by both parties involved and set a standard for future cases involving similar disputes over contractual obligations.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Oregon Steam Navigation Company v. Winsor, the United States Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a contract between two parties could be enforced when it had been made without consideration and in violation of a state statute. The majority opinion held that the contract was unenforceable due to its lack of consideration and violation of state law. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision on the grounds that there were sufficient facts presented to show that both parties intended for their agreement to be binding even though it lacked consideration or violated any laws. He argued that since no fraud or mistake had occurred, and since both parties acted in good faith, then they should not be prevented from enforcing their agreement simply because it did not meet certain legal requirements such as having consideration or being compliant with all applicable statutes. Thus, he concluded that while contracts must generally comply with statutory requirements in order to be enforceable under common law principles, exceptions can exist if there is evidence showing an intent by both sides for their agreement to bind them regardless of these technicalities.

Opinion written by Justice JPBradley
Decided: May 04, 1874
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms