Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case involved the Oregon-Washington Carpenters-Employers Pension Trust Fund, which sought to recover withdrawal liability from R. A. Gray & Co., a company that had ceased contributing to the multiemployer pension plan as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The central issue was whether Congress could retroactively impose such liability on employers who withdrew before ERISA's Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 took effect. The Supreme Court held that Congress did not violate due process by applying this law retroactively because it served legitimate legislative purposes and provided for rational means of achieving those objectives. The decision emphasized that while retrospective legislation is generally disfavored, it can be justified if there is a clear public interest and reasonable notice given to affected parties.
Opinion written by Justice Brennan
Decided 18 Jun 1984 · Official report