Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Pace v. Burgess, Collector

• 1875 • 92 U.S. 372 • Waite Court
Pace v. Burgess, Collector was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of taxation. The case involved a dispute between the plaintiff, Pace, and the defendant, Burgess, who was the Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Alabama. Pace had been assessed a tax on the sale of certain property, and he argued that the assessment was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court held that the assessment was valid and that the tax was not a violation of the Constitution. The...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1875
Docket: 170
92 U.S. 372
23 L. Ed. 657
1875 U.S. LEXIS 1768
Argued: Mar 16, 1876

Pace v. Burgess, Collector

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Pace v. Burgess, Collector was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of taxation. The case involved a dispute between the plaintiff, Pace, and the defendant, Burgess, who was the Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Alabama. Pace had been assessed a tax on the sale of certain property, and he argued that the assessment was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court held that the assessment was valid and that the tax was not a violation of the Constitution. The Court reasoned that the tax was a valid exercise of the power of taxation granted to Congress by the Constitution. The Court also held that the tax was not a violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as the tax was imposed in a reasonable manner and was not arbitrary or oppressive. In conclusion, the Supreme Court held that the assessment of the tax was valid and did not violate the Constitution. The Court's decision established that Congress has the power to impose taxes on the sale of property, and that such taxes must be imposed in a reasonable manner and not be arbitrary or oppressive.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of PACE v. BURGESS, COLLECTOR, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a tax imposed by Congress on distilled spirits was constitutional. The majority opinion held that it was not unconstitutional and upheld the tax. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision and argued that Congress had no authority to impose such a tax under its power to regulate commerce among states or with foreign nations. He further argued that if Congress could impose taxes in this manner then there would be no limit on their taxing powers which would lead to an oppressive form of taxation for citizens across the country. Furthermore, he noted that while some taxes may be necessary for revenue purposes they should only be imposed when authorized by specific grants of power from either state legislatures or through amendments made directly by citizens themselves rather than being left up solely to congressional discretion as proposed here.

Opinion written by Justice JPBradley
Decided: Apr 17, 1876
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms