Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Pacific Railroad v. Ketchum

• 1879 • 101 U.S. 289 • Waite Court
Pacific Railroad v. Ketchum was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a railroad company was liable for damages caused by a train accident. The plaintiff, Ketchum, was a passenger on a train operated by the defendant, Pacific Railroad. Ketchum was injured when the train derailed due to a broken rail. Ketchum sued the railroad for damages, claiming that the railroad was negligent in maintaining the track. The Supreme Court held that the railroad was liable for...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1879
Docket: 242
101 U.S. 289
25 L. Ed. 932
1879 U.S. LEXIS 1918
Argued: Jan 27, 1880

Pacific Railroad v. Ketchum

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Pacific Railroad v. Ketchum was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a railroad company was liable for damages caused by a train accident. The plaintiff, Ketchum, was a passenger on a train operated by the defendant, Pacific Railroad. Ketchum was injured when the train derailed due to a broken rail. Ketchum sued the railroad for damages, claiming that the railroad was negligent in maintaining the track. The Supreme Court held that the railroad was liable for Ketchum's injuries. The Court reasoned that the railroad had a duty to maintain the track in a safe condition and that it had breached this duty by failing to inspect and repair the broken rail. The Court also held that the railroad was liable for Ketchum's damages, even though the railroad had not been negligent in operating the train. The Court's decision in Pacific Railroad v. Ketchum established that a railroad company is liable for damages caused by a train accident, even if the railroad was not negligent in operating the train. This decision has been cited in numerous subsequent cases involving railroad liability.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Pacific Railroad v. Ketchum, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a railroad company could be held liable for damages caused by its negligence in failing to provide adequate safety measures on its property. The majority opinion of the court found that the railroad had not breached any duty owed to passengers and thus could not be held liable for their injuries. Justice Field dissented from this decision, arguing that it was well established law at the time of this case that railroads were required to use reasonable care when transporting passengers and goods over their lines and should therefore be responsible for any harm resulting from their failure to do so. He further argued that if railroads were allowed immunity from liability in such cases, they would have no incentive whatsoever to ensure passenger safety or take other necessary precautions while operating trains on their tracks.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Mar 22, 1880
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms