Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Papachristou Et Al. v. City Of Jacksonville

• 1971 • 405 U.S. 156 • Burger Court
In the case of Papachristou et al. v. City of Jacksonville, 1971, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a city ordinance in Jacksonville, Florida was unconstitutionally vague and violated due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The ordinance criminalized activities such as "wandering or strolling around from place to place without any lawful purpose or object," which were deemed too broad and ambiguous by the court. This decision came after eight individuals were arrested and convicted...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1971
Docket: 70-5030
405 U.S. 156
92 S. Ct. 839
31 L. Ed. 2d 110
1972 U.S. LEXIS 84
Argued: Dec 08, 1971

Papachristou Et Al. v. City Of Jacksonville

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Papachristou et al. v. City of Jacksonville, 1971, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a city ordinance in Jacksonville, Florida was unconstitutionally vague and violated due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The ordinance criminalized activities such as "wandering or strolling around from place to place without any lawful purpose or object," which were deemed too broad and ambiguous by the court. This decision came after eight individuals were arrested and convicted for violating this law; their convictions were subsequently overturned by this ruling. The court's decision emphasized that laws must be clear enough so ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Papachristou et al. v. City of Jacksonville, there was no dissenting opinion recorded as the Supreme Court's decision was unanimous in favor of Papachristou and his co-petitioners. The court ruled that a Florida vagrancy law under which they were convicted was unconstitutionally vague, violating due process clause because it did not give adequate notice to citizens about what conduct is prohibited and encouraged arbitrary enforcement by police officers.

Opinion written by Justice WODouglas
Decided: Feb 24, 1972
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms