Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Paragon Jewel Coal Co., Inc. v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue

• 1964 • 380 U.S. 624 • Warren Court
The Paragon Jewel Coal Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue case in 1964 revolved around the issue of tax deductions for coal mining companies. The Supreme Court ruled against Paragon Jewel Coal Company, which had claimed a depletion deduction on its federal income taxes based on the sale price of coal at the mine mouth (the point where it is ready to be shipped), rather than at an earlier stage when it was removed from the ground and not yet processed or cleaned. The court held that...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1964
Docket: 134
380 U.S. 624
85 S. Ct. 1207
14 L. Ed. 2d 116
1965 U.S. LEXIS 2227
Argued: Mar 08, 1965

Paragon Jewel Coal Co., Inc. v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Paragon Jewel Coal Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue case in 1964 revolved around the issue of tax deductions for coal mining companies. The Supreme Court ruled against Paragon Jewel Coal Company, which had claimed a depletion deduction on its federal income taxes based on the sale price of coal at the mine mouth (the point where it is ready to be shipped), rather than at an earlier stage when it was removed from the ground and not yet processed or cleaned. The court held that "gross income from mining" should be calculated after processing costs were deducted, but before transportation costs were subtracted - meaning that these expenses could not be included in calculating depletion allowances for tax purposes.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Paragon Jewel Coal Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Justice Harlan disagreed with the majority's interpretation of tax law and its application to coal mining companies like Paragon Jewel Coal Co. He argued that the majority had misinterpreted Section 613 of the Internal Revenue Code which provides a percentage depletion allowance for certain minerals including coal. According to him, this provision was intended by Congress as a form of capital recovery for miners who exhaust their mineral resources over time; it wasn't meant to provide an additional profit center beyond normal business operations or serve as a subsidy from taxpayers at large. The justice also criticized how his colleagues applied this provision in practice, stating they allowed deductions far exceeding any potential capital investment made by these companies into their mines - effectively turning what should be a limited tax relief measure into an unwarranted windfall gain.

Opinion written by Justice TCClark
Decided: Apr 28, 1965
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms