Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Parham v. Hughes

• 1978 • 441 U.S. 347 • Burger Court
In the case of Parham v. Hughes, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a challenge to Georgia's wrongful death statute which only allowed parents to sue for damages if they were married at the time of their child's death or had been married in the past. The plaintiff, Hughes, was an unwed father who sought damages after his son died due to medical malpractice but was denied by lower courts because he did not meet these requirements. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court upheld Georgia’s law and found...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1978
Docket: 78-3
441 U.S. 347
99 S. Ct. 1742
60 L. Ed. 2d 269
1979 U.S. LEXIS 90
Argued: Jan 15, 1979

Parham v. Hughes

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Parham v. Hughes, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a challenge to Georgia's wrongful death statute which only allowed parents to sue for damages if they were married at the time of their child's death or had been married in the past. The plaintiff, Hughes, was an unwed father who sought damages after his son died due to medical malpractice but was denied by lower courts because he did not meet these requirements. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court upheld Georgia’s law and found that it did not violate equal protection rights under Fourteenth Amendment as claimed by Hughes. The majority opinion held that there is no constitutional requirement for states to remain neutral in situations where marital status plays a role and further argued that such laws could encourage familial stability.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Parham v. Hughes, Justice Brennan disagreed with the majority's decision to uphold Georgia's paternity law that denied unmarried fathers equal protection rights as mothers and married fathers. He argued that this law was discriminatory and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it treated different groups of parents differently based solely on their marital status. Justice Brennan believed there was no compelling state interest in treating unmarried fathers less favorably than other parents, especially when considering important matters such as parental rights or child welfare issues. Furthermore, he contended that using marriage as a determinant for parental rights could lead to unfair outcomes where unfit married parents are granted more legal protections than fit unmarried ones. In his view, all biological parents should have an equal opportunity to establish their parentage regardless of their marital status.

Opinion written by Justice PStewart
Decided: Apr 24, 1979
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms