Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Parissi v. Telechron, Inc. Et Al.

• 1954 • 349 U.S. 46 • Warren Court
In the case of Parissi v. Telechron, Inc., 1954, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a copyright infringement claim could not be brought in federal court without first having registered the copyrighted work with the U.S. Copyright Office. The plaintiff, Joseph Parissi, had composed a song and sold it to various customers without registering for copyright protection. When he discovered that his song was being used by Telechron Inc., he filed suit alleging copyright infringement but failed...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1954
Docket: 302
349 U.S. 46
75 S. Ct. 577
99 L. Ed. 2d 867
1955 U.S. LEXIS 943
Argued: Mar 29, 1955

Parissi v. Telechron, Inc. Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Parissi v. Telechron, Inc., 1954, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a copyright infringement claim could not be brought in federal court without first having registered the copyrighted work with the U.S. Copyright Office. The plaintiff, Joseph Parissi, had composed a song and sold it to various customers without registering for copyright protection. When he discovered that his song was being used by Telechron Inc., he filed suit alleging copyright infringement but failed to register his work prior to filing suit as required by law at that time. The Supreme Court held that registration is a prerequisite for an infringement action under federal law and dismissed Parissi's lawsuit.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Parisi v. Telechron, Inc., Justice Robert H. Jackson disagreed with the majority's decision to deny copyright protection to a work that had been published without notice of copyright as required by law at that time. He argued that such an interpretation was too strict and did not align with the intent of Congress when it enacted the Copyright Act. According to Justice Jackson, Congress intended for authors to have broad protections over their works and this should include situations where they inadvertently fail to comply with technical requirements like providing notice of copyright upon publication. The justice also expressed concern about how denying protection in these cases could lead to unfair outcomes where innocent authors lose rights over their works due solely to minor errors or oversights.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Apr 11, 1955
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms