Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Paschall Et Al. v. Christie-stewart, Inc., Et Al.

• 1973 • 414 U.S. 100 • Burger Court
In the case of Paschall et al. v. Christie-Stewart, Inc., et al., 1973, the U.S Supreme Court was asked to consider whether a state court could exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state corporation based on its advertising in national media outlets that reached consumers within the state. The plaintiffs were residents of Kentucky who had purchased a defective product from Christie-Stewart, Inc., a New York-based company that advertised nationally but did not have any physical presence in...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1973
Docket: 72-922
414 U.S. 100
94 S. Ct. 313
38 L. Ed. 2d 298
1973 U.S. LEXIS 176
Argued: Oct 16, 1973

Paschall Et Al. v. Christie-stewart, Inc., Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Paschall et al. v. Christie-Stewart, Inc., et al., 1973, the U.S Supreme Court was asked to consider whether a state court could exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state corporation based on its advertising in national media outlets that reached consumers within the state. The plaintiffs were residents of Kentucky who had purchased a defective product from Christie-Stewart, Inc., a New York-based company that advertised nationally but did not have any physical presence in Kentucky. They filed suit against the company in their home state and won at trial; however, this decision was overturned by an appellate court which ruled that Kentucky courts lacked personal jurisdiction over Christie-Stewart because it did not conduct business directly within the state. The Supreme Court reversed this ruling and held that states can indeed assert jurisdiction over non-resident corporations if they purposefully avail themselves of doing business with residents through national advertisements or other means. This landmark decision expanded consumer protections by allowing individuals to sue out-of-state companies for damages without having to travel outside their home jurisdictions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Paschall et al. v. Christie-Stewart, Inc., et al., the justice argued that the majority's decision to uphold a lower court ruling in favor of Christie-Stewart was incorrect because it relied on an overly broad interpretation of "navigable waters." The dissent pointed out that while federal law does grant authority over navigable waters, this should not extend to all bodies of water within a state's boundaries. Furthermore, they contended that allowing such an expansive definition could lead to potential abuses and conflicts between state and federal jurisdictions. They also disagreed with the majority’s view about riparian rights being irrelevant in this case; instead arguing these rights are crucial as they provide landowners with certain protections against encroachments by others onto their property along waterways.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Nov 19, 1973
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms